Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Eastman (software engineer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Art of Illusion. Anyone wanting to merge content can do so from the page history of the redirect. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Eastman (software engineer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:BASIC. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Art of Illusion, most of the info is just a repeat of what is already on the Art of Illusion page; perhaps it would be better to have a brief section about it's development and mention Peter Eastman there. Jazatz2 (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: there seems to be no need to have this information since it is on Art of Illusion and he isn't notable otherwise. FiddleheadLady (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Art of Illusion#History. I am not seeing any information that is suitable for merging and what already exists on the suggested target article is sufficient. Suggesting a straight redirect to the History sub-section as a suitable alternative to outright deletion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.