Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Anghelides

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kursaal. While there is a consensus to redirect, the redirect target may be discussed separately. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Anghelides[edit]

Peter Anghelides (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Refunded via RFU. Relisting as AFD. Original PROD was: No coverage whatsoever in RS, probably appropriate for a redirect to Doctor Who but fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revised and updated, with additional RS. Equivalent to other articles linked from List of Doctor Who novelists. 51.7.170.248 (talk) 23:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 02:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is fine, notability is from Doctor Who. Oaktree b (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If delete is decided on, I am not sure redirecting to Doctor Who would be particularly useful as he is not mentioned on that page and his involvement is not with the TV series or any of its television spin-offs, but its spin-off media like audio plays and books. Also although it is possibly lower profile, he has also written a lot of Blake's 7 spin-off media. He has been a writer and producer for Big Finish Productions, but does not seem to be currently explicitly mentioned at that article either or that might be a possible redirect. Another option might be his first published full-length Doctor Who novel Kursaal, though it is probably not his best known work. Dunarc (talk) 22:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Has an entry in SFE: [1]. --|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]| reply here 02:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to be mentioned in enough independent sources establishing notability, the prominence of the shows he has been involved in as context to those mentions also tends towards notability Jack4576 (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Kursaal as per Dunarc. All of the cited sources are either trivial mentions or interviews (i.e. Primary sources). None of other sites that I found can constitute significant coverage. It seems the only suitable source is the encyclopedia page found by Piotrus. Unless more significant coverage are found, the article does not seem to pass WP:GNG at its current state. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.