Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Carney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Congratulations on your shiny new mop Jim but unfortunately this one's a draw. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Carney[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:MUS or WP:GNG. General lack of sources both in article and when searching outside of wikipedia. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 23:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

* Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jazz notified. -- AllyD (talk) 18:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I've added reviews from several sources including All About Jazz (though not the most positive) relating to CDs and performances from Chicago to Aberdeen, which I think amount to just about enough for a keep. AllyD (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep based on festival appearances. I wonder if this Pete Carney could be the same person? -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No claim of notability. Keb25 (talk) 07:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is one of those "when in doubt, keep" due to the multiple appearances and limited coverage I feel this one skirts by WP:MUSIC, but just barely so. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 23:07, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.