Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet rats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close, moot now that it's redirected. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pet rats[edit]

Opinion piece about keeping rats as pets: fails WP:OR and WP:SOAP. The subject is well covered at Rats; two editors have redirected the article there but the author has rejected this. Ros0709 (talk) 22:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Although the article is not now up to WP standards pet rats are a notable subject and should have their own article. I bet pet ferrets do. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Fancy rat. My bad. Here is the article on pet rats. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Fancy rat. Nothing worthwhile to merge. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the author learned a little more about how WP works he/she could make a valuable contribution. Steve Dufour (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've already redirected to fancy rats per WP:UCS. The content was completely non-neutral, an advocacy piece for rats as pets. There's no reason to have a separate page. The only reason it wasn't a speedy candidate is 'cause the page is useful as a redirect. WLU (talk) 01:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.