Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet de Kat Krewe (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pet de Kat Krewe[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Pet de Kat Krewe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has been tagged for at least six months for notability, but I can find nothing online that shows notability other than brief mentions over a decade ago. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Smells of WP:PROMOTION. Other than member pages, no substantive visibility, and no news coverage.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Save. An [| archived debate] dated April 2006 of a proposed deletion of the article determined page may stay. Contributors to the article have also responded to wiki request and established notability by adding several secondary sources about the topic.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.213.212.233 (talk)
- Save. References cited demonstrate the subject of article is genuine, if a bit self promotional. Save it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.138.65 (talk) 13:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article fails to assert the significance or accomplishments of the crew. EternalFlare (talk) 13:41, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seeming WP:DUCK canvassing or puppetry here at this AFD. In terms of the article itself, it's overly promotional in nature, the links are spammy and full of press releases, and lacks a credible assertion to notability along with no WP:SIGCOV. Mkdwtalk 08:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.