Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perth Broncos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. An argument is raised for merger, but there is no actual verified content to be merged. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Broncos[edit]

Perth Broncos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur team, fails WP:GNG - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable source. Hack (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without the presentation of any sources to exceed WP:GNG, I have to agree. Even if we assume good faith I still think it will fall short.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete there is a national amateur gridiron league which is the highest level in Australia. This team does not play that level. LibStar (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not top level of the sport, article has no references, list on non-notables, same as above.Hughesdarren (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge whilst not potentially notable I it's own right - the information about the team history should be merged/incorporated into Gridiron West. Dan arndt (talk) 13:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.