Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persons related to Qur'anic verses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 00:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persons related to Qur'anic verses[edit]

Delete completely unencyclopedic, fork. Jersey Devil 06:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User Jersey Devil appears to be on the war path against User Striver by proposing all articles created by the latter for deletion. Sad. Lambiam 16:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment can you please elaborate on why this should stay?--Jersey Devil 21:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Besides Zayd ibn Harithah, Banu Hashim, and Abu Lahab, the rest is original research without any verifiable sources. Nontheless, there is nothing worth keeping anyhow. Pepsidrinka 07:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Listcruft. Feezo (Talk) 10:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
unsure, not worse than many other lists around here. Needs references though, if deleted, may be recreated with proper references and discussion. dab (ᛏ) 15:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Certainly more notable than the lists of pokemon and other Listcruft. See list of lists. This list in itself is higly important for Muslim, can you imaging being addresed by the Qur'an? Or being the reason for a verse coming? Now, there is fame. List needs better sourcing, that is a reason to slap a sign on it, not to afd it. see also bottom half of Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild/Articles for deletion--Striver 15:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jersey Devil stop trying to make a Point -Irishpunktom\^talk 16:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can you please use Wikipedia policy to elaborate on why this should stay?--Jersey Devil 21:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per irishpunktom B.ellis 21:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has to be given the benefit of any doubt due to circumstances of the nomination. Dlyons493 Talk 22:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge content—if properly verified—either to Qur'an or to the articles for the Suras in which the people are mentioned. WP:V is a must. Relative importance of being mentioned in the Qur'an might also be addressed. Esquizombi 00:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Zain 02:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.