Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal choice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal choice[edit]

Personal choice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined on this newly-created article. It's a personal essay; I see no content that should be merged to "Gender pay gap in the United States" and no sign that this is a commonly-used term (WP:NEO). Power~enwiki (talk) 01:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete - Not worth merging to the essay-like content. 47.208.20.130 (talk) 01:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete also seems to be a POV fork, created by an administrator -- and apparently, a former crat -- who really ought to know better. The article seems to have been created to give undue weight to the position that personal choices by women are a factor in them getting paid less. Well, fine. Put it in -- or argue it out -- in the main article, as noted above. I don't know what we're supposed to make of gems like "There are very few male "supermodels"." Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for all the reasons stated above. Rab V (talk) 22:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.