Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persefone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Persefone[edit]
- Persefone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has been tagged for over three years due to a lack of references and notability issues, and neither has been addressed. Searching for references only brings up first party sources (ie personal sites). The band is signed only to a relatively minor record label, whose own article was previously deleted via a deletion discussion. The article fails WP:Band. Rorshacma (talk) 21:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Some sources to establish notability: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Those are the result of a search in the .ad domain only, and there may be further non-English sources available elsewhere. I'm not including them in the article now, as the outcome of the discussion is not yet clear and hence it may be a waste of time. -- Trevj (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 15:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — The sources found by User: Trevj seem to establish notability. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 15:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.