Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peretz P. Friedmann
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep (nomination withdrawn, no other support; non-admin closure). -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Peretz P. Friedmann[edit]
- Peretz P. Friedmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability and any references. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes at least WP:Prof#1, WP:Prof#5, andWP:Prof#8. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep and stubbify. Clear pass of multiple WP:PROF criteria: #C5 (named chair at major research university), #C8 (editor-in-chief of AIAA J. as well as another more specialized journal). The article as nominated is speedy deletable as a copyvio of his web page at UMich but I have stubbed it down to something that doesn't have that problem.
- Keep. Per Xxanthippe. Finnegas (talk) 10:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Papers' impact is not impressive, but fulfills leadership and award criteria.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Tyros1972 Talk 10:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per named professorship and editorship. Now who wants to write a real biography? Carrite (talk) 02:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw AfD After reading the guidelines more carefully I concur with the above comments and withdraw my AfD nom. Apologies for not looking more closely at this. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your courtesy and helpfulness. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep. I will interview the professor and get a team together and try to write a better article.Plcoopr (talk) 04:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, but please look for reliable sources (that is, stuff published about him by other people) rather than trying to generate your own sources from an interview. That's not usually considered to be of adequate verifiability, especially given the extra care needed in a biography of a living person. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.