Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peppermint Parlour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 01:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Peppermint Parlour[edit]
- Peppermint Parlour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't really find any reliable sourcing on this band at all. The only thing I've been able to find on them was a trivial name drop in a BBC article [1], and searches don't turn up a thing remotely reliable other than that: [2], [3] (always telling when the Wikipedia article is the top result), [4]. The article also has a significantly promotional tone ("musical gems", "extremely talented", saying other bands were "less talented" with no sourcing to back that, etc.) With sources to work from, that might be fixable, but the sources aren't there. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete for lack of potential sources Polarpanda (talk) 20:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can find no in-depth coverage for this band; appears to fail WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 22:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 23:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. My search of other news sources also revealed nothing significant. Cbl62 (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:BAND - no national tours, no radio hits, etc. Also, they are difficult to verify for lack of sources. Bearian (talk) 05:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: When an undeletion was requested, one of the reasons used was that the band had a cult following in Japan, but I was unable to turn up anything in Japanese mentioning them at all. Nick Wilson (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.