Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepper Binkley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pepper Binkley[edit]

Pepper Binkley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress doesn't meet WP:GNG. Lack of third-party sources. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk), that's correct; as I said, they are mere mentions. But, when taken with the sources already in the article as well as other, less reliable sources online, I think that WP:GNG is met. Dflaw4 (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More time for input from other people
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラP 15:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per WP:ENT, there is a lack of notable roles (even in notable shows) that she has done to warrant her own page. Per WP:GNG, while the subject has been mentioned by reputable sources, I do not believe that the coverage (as it stands) is "significant" enough to warrant an entire article about the subject. Right now, it's really only an extended imdb page. Only comment is that I do not have access to the WSJ article, so I can't say much about its content. – BriefEdits (talk) 21:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    BriefEdits, the only line of the WSJ that mentions her is "The evening brought out guests like actress Ruth Wilson (with Mr. Ashford), Lynn Wyatt, Jamee and Peter Gregory, Agnes Gund, Bill and Karen Ackman, Chris Mack, Bettina Zilkha, Ziel and Helene Feldman, ICM agent Jennifer Joel and her sister Haley Joel Satnick, Pepper Binkley and Marshall Sebring, Ken Kuchin and Tyler Morgan, Armory President Rebecca Robertson and new artistic director Pierre Audi."
    I can copy and paste the entire article if you want since I have access but I think that might be a copyvio for Wikipedia.--Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Tyw7 Oh no, it's fine. But yeah, it seems like the WSJ article is about the same as the other sources then. – BriefEdits (talk) 22:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • BriefEdits, it's true that the Wall Street Journal article is just a mere mention, but the two articles I referred to above which are in the page itself provide more substantial coverage. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • BriefEdits, I'll certainly keep my eyes peeled for better sources, too. Thanks for your reply, much appreciated! Dflaw4 (talk) 07:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the close, ongoing discusion, and disagreement over whether the non-ancillary source coverage is sufficient for notability
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I have now updated the page and added the two references I provided above. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I didn't previously comment on WP:NACTOR because it was not nominated as an issue (only WP:GNG was), but, in addition to my previous arguments for "Keeping" this article, I would add the following: the subject was a series regular for season 4 of Fifteen and she starred in the 2009 film, Asylum Seekers, both of which appear to be notable productions; and she also had what seems to be a significant role in the 2010 film, Stone, and has starred in a couple of other films of low-to-moderate notability. I believe there is enough here to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.