Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People who Have Played Éponine Thénardier from Les Misérables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People who Have Played Éponine Thénardier from Les Misérables[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this up for discussion. I personally have no strong feelings either way as to whether this should be deleted or not, but am curious to know what others think about it. The article is actually really well referenced and extensively researched, but I don't see where we have similar pages for any other character in anything else, apart from a few examples like Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Who. It does look encyclopaedic for someone interested in the subject, but I wouldn't consider Éponine in the same league as Sherlock Holmes or the Doctor, so I think it is worth discussion. Either way, the creator did an amazing job collecting this information so it should be preserved somewhere even if it is decided not to be suitable for Wikipedia. (Too much to merge to Éponine?) Mabalu (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Specifically point 3 : "Excessive listings of statistics". Keep anyone who received significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources for their role and put them into Les Misérables (musical) or the equivalent article if they're not there. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do have strong feelings: delete. This is way TMI of an unencyclopedic quality. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have no strong feelings: "no preference". Heck, I wrote this article, it's called being very bored on a summer day. mchristine1995 (talk) ) 11:54, 20 July 2013 (CST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.208.139 (talk)
Delete I have to echo Ritchie333: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Poor Éponine never catches a break, does she? And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not an encyclopedic topic, which is a way of expressing the same sentiments stated above. Carrite (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It's a really nice piece of work, by the way, my apologies to the content creator. Carrite (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.