Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People Just Like Us

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other recommendations for deletion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

People Just Like Us[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUMS Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to withdraw my nomination based on the recent reference of Platinum status. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment On 19 June 2014 the nominator PRODed some 50+ Hillsong-related articles see here. From 21 June I noticed this list and that some 10+ of these PRODs were charting albums at either ARIA or Billboard. I have gone through more of the 50+ list and added sources where possible and dePRODed any that I felt had a reliable source for their existence. I was hoping to get time to supply further sources to attempt to establish notability. With so many article to research this is not necessarily achievable in a short time-frame. The nominator has sent most of the dePRODed articles straight to AfD. I ask for time/assistance in actually searching for sources to support the articles' notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reviewed by Cross Rhythms, as per the article, plus it was noted for going platinum page 360. Business Review Weekly: Volume 24, Issues 32-38 mentioned the album on page 66; The Bulletin, Issues 6437-6445 on page 33; and Charisma and Christian Life, Volume 24, Issue 5 on pages 60 and 61; but I do not have access to those source (the page hits I got from Google), so I can't say how significant the mentions are.--¿3family6 _contribs 20:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for reasons stated above. Correct me if I'm doing the vote wrong. I'm very new at this. Jair Crawford (talk) 02:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.