Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeopleHR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PeopleHR[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources are blogs, cover different topics or are (about) case studies for other software companies. No significant in-depth coverage about the company itself in independent, reliable, sources. Mduvekot (talk) 11:43, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:07, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:07, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not meet WP:GNG, as per several source searches; not finding enough coverage to qualify an article at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 19:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This fails WP:CORPDEPTH. There are very few references out there at all actually and the ones that are there simply mention the name. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fsils GNG and is lacking in WP:CORPDEPTH. Antonioatrylia (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.