Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Health Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:HEY. However, it appears that the article's creator may be involved with this organization. We should keep an eye on it. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People's Health Movement[edit]

Has notability issues for WP:ORG. Only references are to the org's website. The WHO reference is what they're working towards and not a reference to this org. Shadowjams (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Abundant references in reliable sources. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/breakfast/stories/2005/1329678.htm http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=125&art_id=vn20070909093053476C114959 http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=36357 -- Eastmain (talk) 22:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly some references have been added to the article since its nomination for deletion, and I think those references establish the notability enough to satisfy WP:CORP. -- Atama ^chat 17:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's been a lot of really good work done since my nom, which was done without the help of the recent edits. I'll hold off commenting beyond that until the afd's closed. Others should continue to comment. Shadowjams (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.