Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Climate Mobilization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be made a draft by those who like such things. Sandstein 08:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

People's Climate Mobilization[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage of the event does not go beyond announcements. Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX for political activism. — JFG ^talk 07:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep, as article creator. This event is a month away. Let the article snowball, then we can revisit again very soon. There is plenty of coverage and it is likely the article would just need to be recreated in a couple weeks. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON. May be a flop and can be easily restored if it turns out to be notable. Number 5 7 19:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draft space The event is a month away, and it would be a good idea to give the the creator time to develop the article and release it ~1 week before the event. Cheers, FriyMan ^talk 07:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: For those who are doing research on this topic, please keep in mind many sources are referring to this event as the People's Climate March, and even the organizers' website refers to the People's Climate Movement, so you'll want to search for this phrases, too. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if this is the official Facebook event page, the event may now be called "People's Climate Movement". ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After more research, and given the language used on the event's official website, I propose moving this page to People's Climate Movement, but won't do so now because I don't think page moved are allowed during ongoing AfD discussions. I have, however, submitted a move request on the article's talk page, which I hope is appropriate. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO and WP:TOOSOON. Although some demonstratinos become notable before they happen, almost all sources here are primary and PROMO. This protest march may or may not prove to be notable; the morning after will show. Until that point, WP:SOAPBOX.E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draft space or otherwise putting on hold seems a good idea. If this is anything like the 2014 or 2015 marches, with participants in affiliated actions spanning a majority of the world's countries, or even just turns out very large crowds in Washington D.C., it will certainly merit an article. But at this point it does appear WP:TOOSOON. Plato Shrimp —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as being WP:TOOSOON. E.M.Gregory gives a very concise rationale to which I can add nothing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.