Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentrepoeth School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone wants to redirect go for it.--Wizardman 01:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pentrepoeth School[edit]

Poorly written, seems non-notable and also is biased. Mess of an article. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 09:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was about to put this up for deletion when I noticed that Dissident (oddly ironic name btw) had already put it up , for all the same reasons as the nominator. Cat-five - talk 10:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lol yes, when you think about it, my name is quite ironic for my work in afd huh? Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 10:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: I've tidied up the article a bit and added a link to the school's website. I also agree that it's deletable in its current state, but if someone wanted to spend the time it could probably be brought up to standard. -- Sjb90 10:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For an article on a primary school to be kept, I think, some sort of exceptional notabilty (that is, some characteristic or event not shared by every other elementary school on the planet) needs to be demonstrated. Nothing like that here. Deor 13:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rhiwderin. Article makes no claim of notability. No distinguishing characteristics were found on the school's website, Google or Google news/Archive. Primary schools have a tough road to climb to establish notability, and this article does not pass that bar. Alansohn 04:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rhiwderin per Alansohn and WP:LOCAL as well. Redirects are cheap. RFerreira 06:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of reliable sources (at least on the internet) to establish notability.--Kylohk 16:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call to close -- its been five days. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 04:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.