Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania German Wikipedia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania German Wikipedia[edit]

Completely non-notable Wiki encyclopedia website. Though it consider as original research and only fewer than 1,000 articles. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 04:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Wikipedias, like many of the small Wikipedias in Template:Wikipedias. --Reinoutr (talk) 07:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, no need to have separate articles on non notable websites, but redirects are cheap and the general concept of Wikipedias in many languages is notable. Fram (talk) 07:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Wikipedias. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't want it deleted (I find the idea of an Amish Wikipedia interesting), but I can't really argue against its deletion - there isn't any third-party coverage cited by the article. However, I'd like to note that the nominator is nominating several Wikipedia editions for deletion. Andjam (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As there is so few internet material about the idiom, and as other Wikipedia's have articles too, I am for keeping it.--Ziko (talk) 13:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There are many Wikipedias without an article, an at least seventeen who currently redirect to the same list. WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not really the best arguments to keep something. Fram (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.