Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penguin Travel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:G11. Stifle (talk) 19:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Penguin Travel[edit]
- Penguin Travel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability; possibly advertising. Biruitorul (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It seems to be an ad for a non-notable business. Borock (talk) 17:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam/advertising. Cirt (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources to indicate notability. The article appears to be WP:ADVERT. Nsk92 (talk) 23:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, where everything that is written in non promotional language should be welcome. I do not think that the language here is advertising, on the contrary - it is quite informative (e.g. the profile of Thomas Cook contains much more advertisements...). But it will be interesting to see how equitable the local moderators are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.187.124.60 (talk) 12:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC) — 85.187.124.60 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Do not deleteThe text is giving a short information about a touroperator based in Denmark. There is no promotional language in it. Have a look at TUI AG profile - it has a lot more external links leading to the company commercial website, which should be also considered as advertising.Brahiblasta (talk) 12:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)— Brahiblasta (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- That's debatable, but let's assume for the moment it's not advertising. We still don't have evidence of notability or verifiability, which are necessary. Biruitorul (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.