Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pencil Full Of Lead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pencil Full Of Lead[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

possibly fails wikipedia notability. little context, multiple referances for single item. Alankc (talk) 00:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4],[5], [6], and [7]. Joe Chill (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The coverage isn't too impressive but it's a top 20 hit in the UK.--Michig (talk) 08:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral/Merge. WP:NSONG says "Songs that have been ranked on national ... charts ... are probably notable" (emphasis added), and then goes on to recommend that "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist". The chart success of the song is enough to ensure notability for Paolo Nutini (along with his other achievements), but I'm not sure that this particular song merits its own article. Tevildo (talk) 13:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The BBC, Glasswerk, FemaleFirst, and Angry Ape references are good enough to pass WP:NSONGS. Gongshow ^Talk 07:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.WP:NSONGS. The preceding comment was added by MortonFC66 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
Please sign your comments correctly. That isn't the first example of an incorrect signature. If you're having some particular difficulty in signing your comments then let us know and we can work towards a solution. Adambro (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. More coverage here.--Michig (talk) 12:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks notable based on what I'm seeing. Reach Out to the Truth 19:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:SONGS. Ironholds (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.