Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pencak Silat Qutooz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pencak Silat Qutooz[edit]
- Pencak Silat Qutooz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non notable martial art without sources to back up its notability with third person sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references in the article except for a deadlink to a website, and the search links above only show one book which has some unknown coverage of it. Fails notability, questionable on verifiability. May be original research. Edison (talk) 17:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Astudent0 (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This one line article has a lot of problems. The main ones are that there's no reason given why it's notable and it has no sources (reliable or otherwise). Astudent0 (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see nothing in this unsourced article that shows notability and my search didn't find anything to support it. Papaursa (talk) 04:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.