Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penal system in China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by Viztor. (non-admin closure) —Rutebega (talk) 01:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Penal system in China[edit]

Penal system in China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is way too archaic, and most of the content is simply historical and no longer applicable today. Viztor (talk) 22:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. AfD is not cleanup. Yes, the article has been tagged for updating for eight years, but cleanup does not have a deadline in Wikipedia. The topic is obviously notable and updating is a matter of regular editing. If the nominator can identify the outdated facts, WP:SOFIXIT applies. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Gene93k. Mccapra (talk) 04:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep topic is notable and Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A quick question, given the status, is it ok to just delete and rewrite? I was thinking about editing, but I'm quite confused where to start as the entire structure of the article might need to be changed.Viztor (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it looks passes- WP:SOFIXIT --MA Javadi (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn per discussion with Gene93k as I'm working on a draft intended to replace the current content. Viztor (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.