Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pekka Kana 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pekka Kana 2[edit]
- Pekka Kana 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have not been able to verify this information through reliable secondary sources. Article does not explain how this game is notable enough for inclusion. (WP:V, WP:N) Marasmusine (talk) 08:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Marasmusine (talk) 08:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Didn't I just add some sources and even new information? Stupid Hedgehog (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You did indeed, but pistegamez.net is a super source. As an encylopedia, our articles must be based on secondary sources. Marasmusine (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Didn't I just add some sources and even new information? Stupid Hedgehog (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any reliable web sources in either English or Finnish. --Mika1h (talk) 22:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.