Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peiffer Rosca Wolf Abdullah Carr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — The Earwig ⟨talk⟩ 02:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peiffer Rosca Wolf Abdullah Carr[edit]

Peiffer Rosca Wolf Abdullah Carr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability unclear due to high "advertising" content - this version and all previous versions are written like ads. If this didn't have a 4-year edit history with several editors, I would've summarily WP:CSD#G11'd it. If there is a substantial number of people who agree that G11 is appropriate and there are no well-reasoned objections, G11 after 24 hours might be in order even if the topic meets WP:N. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:CORP, WP:MILL, and my standards for law firms. This is an 8-year-old firm with 20 lawyers, and none of their cases have their own articles. Back in the early 1990s, I, too was a plaintiff personal injury attorney, but let's face it, we're dime a dozen. Bearian (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Bearian, and their very reasonable standards for law firms. BD2412 T 19:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.