Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pehchaan (2000)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – czar 16:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pehchaan (2000)[edit]

Pehchaan (2000) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 16:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as lacking secondary sources. IMDb lists it as "Peechan", but that's all I've been able to find. --McGeddon (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fifteen years is certainly long enough for it to have appeared in other sources if it were notable. ubiquity (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alts:
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
screenwriter:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this one could be worth another week, see if any more work is done for sourcing. Courcelles (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm relisting again in the hopes that we can recieve a definitive answer on available sourcing. I also posted a message on Wikiproject Pakistan to see if anyone there can help determine the notability of this article. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.