Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peek-A-Boo Publishing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peek-A-Boo Publishing[edit]

Peek-A-Boo Publishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book company. There is one reliable source here, and doesn't look to be many more around. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Could not access the sole, alleged authoritative reference as it requires a subscription.--Rpclod (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or redirect to founder Don Hoffman, does not meet WP:ORG, a google search brings up nothing notable. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Multiple searches found nothing to suggest notability or improve the article. SwisterTwister talk 18:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Don Hoffman, the company's founder (with the history preserved under the redirect) in lieu of deletion. I was unable to find significant coverage about the subject. Preserving the history will allow the redirect to be easily undone if editors in the future find more sources about the subject that could be used to source and expand the article significantly.

    Cunard (talk) 20:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, however that article is also up for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree redirect and preserve history, or is that merge?Coolabahapple (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, only because the article on Don Hoffman does not meet WP:AUTHOR criteria for notability. Sorry, but thanks for asking.--Rpclod (talk) 03:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.