Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Trebbau López

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Trebbau López[edit]

Pedro Trebbau López (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created along with other also related by an editor that seems to be on the side of a person that sued this and other officials of a company. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco D'Agostino (3rd nomination)is an example of a very similar article created by him that was already deleted. I think the same argument that was given by Xymmax: "The article is essentially the story of ambassador Reich's attempts to sue the subject and other people in the United States for allegedly illegal business practices in Venezuela. There are other sources that have shown up in the article from time to time, but the all center around this. When stripped out, as they are currently, there is little to support notability. Thus, we a have ONEEVENT/BLPCRIME case that properly should be deleted" applies here too. Jflainez (talk) 18:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I agree with Jflainez. I checked the references in the article: Some are broken, two are press releases. Some just mention his name as director of the company or as been a part to the two lawsuits and some don't even cite him. I searched in Google for in depth coverage on Trebbau but I could not find any. Only just some mentions of his name. According to what I found, both lawsuits have been dismissed and both are currently being appealed and the investigation was also dropped according to the WSJ. Most of these new sources I found just talk about the suits and the investigation and don't even cite his name. He fails both WP:BIO and WP:GNG and should be deleted per WP:CRIME. --Rogerx2 (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.