Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro José de Mendoça Rolim de Moura Barreto, 6th Duke of Loulé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro José de Mendoça Rolim de Moura Barreto, 6th Duke of Loulé[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability per argument on Talk:Pedro José de Mendoça Rolim de Moura Barreto, 6th Duke of Loulé #Lack of notability The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 00:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this person is actually claiming to be heir to the Portuguese throne then he might be notable, but the article claims he supports the Duke of Braganza, and the claim that some people regard him as the rightful heir is completely unsourced. PatGallacher (talk) 01:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, I don't vote Pedro. He doesn't even have a page in Portuguese yet so why one in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregkaye (talk • contribs) 08:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tentative keep - If more sources can be produced to establish notability, I will vote to keep. Otherwise, delete. Bali88 (talk) 04:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There probably won't be any. The creator hasn't edited this article in while and nothing substantial has been added about him nor can anyone find reliable sources to support his notability. Whatever relevant information can be merged to Duke of Loulé.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:42. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Per above, not a notable person. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Fails notability per above and lack of references in article or elsewhere to change that. --Jersey92 (talk) 04:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG which this historical figure sadly fails. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 05:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.