Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pealiquor Landing, Denton, Maryland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Williston, Maryland. (ATD) Daniel (talk) 23:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pealiquor Landing, Denton, Maryland[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the sole survivor of a group nomination, but it should have been deleted the first time rather than make us waste time going over it again. GMaps shows a rather baronial house at the location now, but older aerials seem to show that it replaced a considerably smaller building some twenty to thirty years ago. And we've got an explanation for the name, but that it wasn't a settlement, just a pea packing plant at some point. Mangoe (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Williston, Maryland, with mention of the locality. I have found some NewspaperArchive articles about Pealiquor, and more than just on the canning factory, but they are not enough to write an article. Pealiquor became quite the camping and picnicking spot, and a few people lived in the area, but so far, that's all I've been able to find. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One of a dozen river landings on the Upper Choptank that played a role in the overall local history but were not notable in their own right. –dlthewave ☎ 21:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.