Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peaceful correlation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 02:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peaceful correlation[edit]

delete nonsense, not quite patent. Possibly a test page by a new user, User:Luzmarina. I left a note on her (?) talk page but she hasn't been back. --Trovatore 23:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dustimagic! ^{(talk/contribs)} 23:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Mike _{(T C)} 00:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 22:39, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 00:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. (Perhaps a combination of patent nonsense and a neologism?) Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see this in google at all Ruby 02:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.