Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paymix Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paymix Ltd.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization with a grand total of zero Google News hits. All the sources in the article currently are either primary sources or directory listings that are not reliable. Clear failure of WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable company. The subject company exists, but the article fails WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesses-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSF 323 (talk • contribs) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.