Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payday monsanto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G11. I'm going to ring this up as spam. If a neutral editor with no connection to the subject wishes to write a sourced article then go for it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Payday monsanto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's subject may well be notable, but its content is unacceptable, including unsourced and highly-controversial statements and allusions. dci | TALK 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, in agreement with the nomination. This article would need a complete rewrite. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree also; but it's pure WP:OR, ADV (only link is to the Payday monsanto website), BLP and very likely COI - it's the first posting of an SPA and should be treated as such. It's at the least unencyclopedic. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.