Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pax et Bellum Journal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pax et Bellum Journal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article dePRODded by article creator after adding infobox and ISSN/OCLC numbers. PROD reason was "Non-notable irregularly-appearing journal with only 4 issues published. Not indexed in any databases (selective or otherwise; does not even list an ISSN), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG" and (apart from the -trivial- ISSN) still stands. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 21:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete although it is possible for a 3-year-old, student-run journal that publishes infrequently to be notable, I can see no indication that this one is.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:12, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.