Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pax Christi International Peace Award

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pax Christi International Peace Award[edit]

Pax Christi International Peace Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable award. Page created entirely from primary sources Ch1p the chop (talk) 14:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The award was mentioned already in 5+ other articles on here, so that seems pretty notable to me. I will add some more sources. --Shikeishu (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll look through the additional sources, but generally, a mere mention of a topic in a reliable source does not make that topic notable. The topic needs to be featured in a reliable source which is independent of the organisation. See WP:NCORP
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 17:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2020-11 ✍️ create
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One of the comments looks like a keep vote (based on the number of sources), so I do not believe a soft delete would be appropriate in this case.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.