Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulina Constancia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paulina Constancia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete This page has been flagged for notability for a decade, and I still don't believe that it has been established. I would like to see this page improved and am going to try to make some edits myself, but it has too many deep issues at the moment. PickleG13 (talk) 23:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Poetry, Visual arts, Philippines, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 13:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 05:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is about all I find [1], not enough for a !keep. Oaktree b (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there's other coverage, such as this from 1997. That Phuket one looks good to me as well. Nfitz (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:BIO with sources presented above. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per new additions, seems proven to be a notable topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.