Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulie Giganti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paulie Giganti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than a few brushes with the law, and a premature death, the subject is only noted for losing a television cooking competition. Fails WP:SINGLEEVENT and WP:CREATIVE. WWGB (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC) WWGB (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There's not really much more to say. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete tragic, not notable. should probably be blanked per BLP. Dloh cierekim 22:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.