Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Murad Coburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paula Murad Coburn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR; none of her roles are significant enough. She's only known for being the wife and widow of James Coburn. The Film Creator (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- As the written article has many references I think Paula is significant enough.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 03:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: She does not pass WP:NACTOR. Most of the citations on this page come from a website run by a foundation she started with her husband, so not exactly WP:RS. The only reference on her page that is about her and no one else is her obituary. A google search brings up very little. Her filmography is so thin it needs roles like "Reporter #2" to pad it out. There isn't much out there to add to this article, so it doesn't really have "has promise" as a great defence either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asilvering (talk • contribs) 21:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Did my due diligence and I can't find any reliable secondary sources that provide WP:SIGCOV. I even used my advanced Newspapers.com subscription and only found passing mentions of the wedding or her appearing in occasional photographs with her husband. Fails WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.