Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Barbieri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paula Barbieri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this biography is a model and actress who seems primarily notable for having dated O.J. Simpson and testifying at his trial. I checked with the relevant Wikiproject to confirm that she does not appear to meet the SNG WP:NACTOR. That leaves her as a BLP1E for the Simpson case. So I propose merging any relevant content to O. J. Simpson murder case. JBL (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JBL (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. JBL (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. JBL (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - WP:BLP1E. Not otherwise notable. --Jack Frost (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an unremarkable career of very minor roles as an actress, none of which rise to the level of showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Figure is not notable as an actor. In relation to Simpson, BLP1E applies, and there can be mention of her in Simpson-related articles where applicable. However, a standalone article is not warranted. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:47, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.