Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Jebanasam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Jebanasam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. The article is heavily based of one of its sources (http://secretthirteen.org/paul-jebanasam-subtext-mix/), with a few more details. Also investigating the edit log, it appears that the article was first created by a user called "Subtext Recordings", the record label Jebanasam supposedly signs for.

I originally PRODded the article back in March, but withdrawn it due to sources being added. However, going back again and digging a little bit deeper, I'm now not sure these sources are separated enough to show proper notability.

Furthermore, at the time of nomination, at least four of the sources are illegitimate - one is currently broken, two are internal Wikipedia redirects to another record label, and one is his Bandcamp page. The others appear to be promotional pieces for an album of his, thus making them rather contentious sources and potentially not neutral enough to be trustworthy. ↅ𝜞 _{(Contact me) (See my edits)} 22:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In the hopes that someone, anyone, will !vote on this nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.