Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul J. Alessi (3rd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 September 13.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was -- Cirt (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paul J. Alessi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no real claim to notability, no evidence of multiple significant roles in notable productions, no evidence awards are major, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. sourcing is listings or not covering Alessi past trivial or not reliable or self published. original research. probable coi. nothing satisfying WP:ENTERTAINER duffbeerforme (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am not expressing an opinion on his notability, although I am willing to accept the IMDB cast listing as establishing that he acted in the movies listed. But I will just note that despite the previous deletion, this article does not appear to be a speedy deletion candidate, since the current article is different than the deleted version. Rlendog (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, imdb doesn't count as a reliable source, and I do not see significant coverage elsewhere. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I feel this article does not need a deletion as Paul is/was involved in numerous television shows on network television. As well as numerous films and other information. Sources will be updated as per comment requests, I also move that Duffbeerforme be reviewed and questioned as to his multiple deletion records on numerous articles. Please advise me if there is another place to dispute this. I am a fan of Paul's and would like to know why this article was deleted with such gusto by Duffbeerforme. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.82.76.112 (talk) 01:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.