Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Grassi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Mole (U.S. Season 5) . MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Grassi[edit]

Contested prod. I don't think Paul meets the general notability threshold. His only media credits are The Mole and some indy film that's not yet been released. The article also seems to have been written by Paul himself or some reeeaallly big fan of his. I love The Mole, but every wiki-fiber in my being says this article is a no-no. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 20:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite - really messy article, which makes it harder to judge. Wandering Courier (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete or~~ Redirect to The Mole (U.S. Season 5) He received a small amount of coverage regarding his role in the show, but not enough for notability of a separate article. A redirect would perhaps be a good compromise though, since he's already mentioned in the show's article. Raven1977 (talk) 01:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Mole (U.S. Season 5) The article gives no indication why his other exploits are notable, leaving us with just the mention of The Mole, which needs a redirect to point readers to the existing coverage. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I must agree with Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz, this does very much look like Paul Grassi has done this himself, and the trail is a fishy one. It feels wrong. The IMDb source states ...

"IMDb is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this page, which have been supplied by a third party and have not been screened or verified." There you have it ... third party. This could be Paul Grassi himself creating a false web. The other websites are week and are also YouTube. Credible? I don't think so. Wiki may be being used to further his career and fame ... not what it's meant for. --BSTemple (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.