Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Goodhand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 22:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Goodhand[edit]

Delete appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ATHLETE: football/soccer player for a semi-professional team without any indication that he has played in a fully professional league. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related page moves. ClubOranje^T 06:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. As stated, "never made the grade" per WP:ATHLETE WP:FOOTYN etc--ClubOranje^T 06:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not meet notability guidelines. Camw (talk) 07:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails WP:ATHLETE and the general notability guidelines -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 09:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete he almost made it, but not quite. So that means he fails WP:FOOTYN --Ged UK (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. DeMoN2009 16:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.