Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Enenche (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is the challenges present with sources, they do not indicate notability. Star Mississippi 18:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Enenche[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP does not seem to meet WP:NBIO- notability of the church is not WP:INHERITED to the person. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Health and fitness, Christianity, Medicine, and Nigeria. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has substantial coverage in reliable sources such as here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That seems like a promotional puff-piece to me. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its significant coverage in a reliable source. Just because its positive coverage doesn't mean it should be ignored. "Puff piece " is a meaningless catch all, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 06:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- This is about the pastor of a local church on which we have no article. Despite its name there is no indication of the church's size. I am not doubting that anything in the article is true, but that does not imply notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per MrsSnoozyTurtle. The sigcov presented is almost certainly PR or paid given they contain lines like "Endowed with the double-edged gift of scientific knowledge as a medical doctor and God’s anointing for healing, Dr. Enenche’s ministration is characterised by the deliverance of multitudes from every manner of sickness and oppression." Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.