Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul DelPonte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul DelPonte[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a non notable subject who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search shows me sponsored posts and unreliable sources see this, this, this and other unreliable sources. This is a WP:BIO fail. Celestina007 (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nomination, (I was BLP Prodding this at the same time a it was nominated here at AfD) but in any event fails GNG JW 1961^Talk 21:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: CSD G12 Clear copyright violation of NCPC biography. Jack Frost (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Struck. Copyright issue dealt with; thanks OlderWorker and Wugapodes. --Jack Frost (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jack Frost: OlderWorker seems to have removed the copyright violations so I've declined the CSD nomination and deleted the revisions which contained the copied text. If you still think the page should be deleted for other reasons feel free to revise your comment. — Wug·a·po·des 23:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All coverage I can identify is either connected or mentions; none provides significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources and therefore the article fails both WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.