Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Danna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Danna[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:PROMO page and a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. I was not able to find significant RS coverage to confirm notability, just passing mentions. Article created by Special:Contributions/DesignEP with not other contributions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, now it has been nominated. Article written by a single-purpose account. Apart from being a good student, there's nothing here to suggest Danna has had any notable successes as an architect. The online sources are simply brief name-checks, while several of the other 'citations' do not give enough info to identify what/when they are. Wikipedia isn't a directory for every architect. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCREATIVE. Sionk (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject is a working architect who has gotten a couple of side mentions in reliable sources. May achieve notability in the future, nowhere near it now--which makes this more of a resume than an encyclopedia entry. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.