Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Dan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Dan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. Has not played top professional level in Australia which is Super Rugby. LibStar (talk) 04:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found these other articles (1), and (2) but am still not convinced this person is notable Jack4576 (talk) 08:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is some coverage of him, but I don't think enough to pass GNG. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.