Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul B. Freeland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul B. Freeland[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was already PRODed for rationale "Subject fails WP:GNG and meets no inclusionary notability standards". But given that this a Billy Hathorn bio we're talking about, I'd like this to join the 90+ articles that were AFD-deleted. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per reasons cited, and what I said in your other afd.💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 11:30, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and was created by a long since discredited editor who mass created articles about unnotable figures. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.