Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Andrews (magician) (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 09:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Andrews (magician)[edit]

The individual is non-notable. The subject was already submitted and approved for deletion [1] on 23 January 2006, but the page was then re-created on 1 February [2]. Attempts were made over the last three months to try and expand the article. The individual's name does appear in the press in a few minor mentions, but the article still does not meet the Wikipedia standards for notability, and should be re-deleted. -17:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete per above description. -Elonka 17:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RGTraynor 19:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 12:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't see how this illusionist is special.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 03:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Joebeone (Talk) 19:12, 7 May 2006 (UTC
Delete Not notable. The ONLY reference I can find on Google (apart from this page) is this ilusionists own website! -- (217.37.59.203 16:23, May 7, 2006)
Keep References found at numerous trusted sites [3][4][5].Modworker 05:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.