Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattie W. Van Hook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pattie W. Van Hook[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Delete Per WP:NOTMEMORIAL, one of many transcribed obits created by a now-banned user. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:01, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 23:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It looks OK to me. Tony May (talk) 04:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Need more than an obit to establish notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This clearly needs some more discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 08:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While I'm not convinced that the creator's ban status is relevant here, this subject seems to fail GNG and any other standards of notability. Can't find good non-obit sources. Gilded Snail (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article doesn't really make the case for notability (president of a state-level society that does not currently have an article, and first female president of that society, are things that one could potentially be notable for but I'd need to see more evidence) and searching did not turn up anything better than the one unlinked local obituary (possibly a family-written obit, I can't tell) that we currently have as a source. That's not good enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.